I think the theoretical and political performance that can be drawn with the production of a conference or event such as "Days pornológicas" or do now is about "oral Marxism" has to do with the occupation unused topics normative discursive spaces that exceed the regulations and therefore popping margins. What is honor the old and infinite unexpected exercise of making crosses between seemingly incompatible themes or practices, and to bring them together generate a third meaning, or an allegory that offers new readings of such fragmented realities. Working in the production of events with these characteristics is to bet on the transgression of the "normal" and push the limits of what was expected, and cause a perceptual shift or epistemological revolution small scale, to make dialogue worlds usually remain segmented and self-referential ... From this perspective (among others) is that I am interested in the project desclasificatorio and in particular "social events" that are generated from the preparation of each Anal.
In relation to "Marxism oral" I think we have a device in his hands immeasurable, perhaps too large and multifaceted that we will have to deal with much intelligence to not get lost in its folds.
One of these considerations should be the fact that we should define whether we will work with live speeches, practicing with Marxism, and produces weaving social, or those who have gone Marxisms being fossilized over time (to me far more stimulating than the first alternative archeology).
(hence the current problem, practical, and political that I have to do this event at the University, and University ARCIS in particular, because this is where Marxism has become an academic institution, and would not be any unexpected or challenging crossing productive to the conversation in the place where critical theory has made school and market product. So in principle I refuse au sar ARCIS as support for the Oral Marxism, for what that means for the semantic of this gesture and interests that the institution is rigged to any act, interests that are economically and politically. I also think that we would enter a string and structured (rules), which hardly allow us to redesign, it is too strong format)
What remains to be suggesting is the possibility that if we summon the Marxist voices that survive and embodied in specific subjects, they meet in a university area not accustomed accommodate such voices.
Another consideration is the one from which we can, turning the recursive spiral, using formats own "under consideration", in this case the history of Marxism, to generate from the same platform a new meaning. I mean the idea already raised in some time to convene a "Marxist International, where these voices to dialogue. The performance, in this case would be untimely, as an anachronistic gesture not in keeping with the current state of affairs. The unexpected crossing would be the actual meeting of these ghostly voices together, and the possible redefinition of Marxism. This would allow us, as we talked with the President, make the event's long and narrow and lead to other land (I can think of Bolivia, for example, as a good scenario, from what happened with the election of Evo Morales, the coca growers).
I think this does not contradict another format that has been mentioned, witness, support and resource as a potential oral Marxism, as a source of material for the registration of wills committed in history and have left a variety of tracks, more or less readable, throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Now, a third fold (or roll) of Marxism itself that's the theory, both political and economic society that interprets (explains), and establishes procedures for processing. The production here is prolific, but most factual texts and propaganda have been a dead letter (to realize this just go to a Persian or sale of old books).
thing to consider is that early on Marxisms there are many, many such realities that has been applied as a theoretical tool. However, there are issues and problems, theoretical knots are common to the practice of all of them. I think both the symposium (international) and the respective Anal should focus these topics in Marxism that are never resolved complexities, contradictions in the best sense of the word, tension, poles to which trends lean depending on the time historical and interests to defend themselves, are the paradoxes.
Here are some of the issues set that seem relevant.
1 .- One of these contradictions is the tension between theory and practice, the difficulty of staging a performance in the world without betraying the eternal conflict engage the will in the world for processing and cause the opposite, or at least something not expected or wanted, which returns the image of the same will disfigured and monstrous. Despite what Marxism can not refrain from operations in the world, because that is one of its characteristic features, the awareness of that reality is not immutable and that, above all, is a social product, which therefore can be transformed .
2 .- Another issue is one that puts into tension the concept of "decisive ultimately, the ideology or the modes of production, or a dialectic between the two, a mutual determination. This dilemma becomes critical importance since it can figure out a new ruling class that does not require ownership of the means of production to exert its control, but to provide management with information or ideological apparatus, which creates the possibility of producing social relations, production realities, but ultimately is not the Marxist utopia, but returned as total domination.
3 .- key topic for the political practice of Marxism and that is the centerpiece of what is known as Marxism-Leninism is the subject of political leadership. To understand the party leader and a motor of change and as an apparatus of power that is designed to destroy and replace the state and establish a new form of administration, which eventually becomes a new form of domination.
This item carries the inevitable dilemma of "the importation of consciousness" of the fact lighted that there are some who have the privilege of analysis tools that allow them to settle which is what a community needs and how to reach those goals.
4 - The transformation from below or above, the micro revolution or the great revolution, the origins of change, structural or cultural revolution. Anarchist individualism or collective action, the molecular revolution.
5 .- teleology, working for a future time, a final or a goal which can sacrifice the present tense, as if this were not and included this goal, without realizing that the abolition of that goal in mind also it is abolished in the future because you can not work for something without it and updated, is made here and now, if you work to build relations of power to fight the power that is what is finally achieved. This implies a concept of time, usually associated with Marxism is the ideology of progress: Is it possible split with the Marxist ideology of progress and its concept of time?
6 .- The class struggle, class, declassification. Information, management, administration of the future the subsidiary, a state of emergency as a forfeiture of the right to decide, the total administration. The formal abolition of classes, as opposed to real affirmation of social differences. A new classification without classes. The sublimation of the class struggle.
7 .- The theme of alienation as a backdrop. That may be one of the bridges that connect this to the previous anal pornología.
8 .- The subject of the official, who is closely related to the membership and the party. The official figure is resolved the issue of needing the expertise, dedication full-time members of the bureaucratic apparatus that requires the forefront, the professional politician, once the dynamics involved in the acquisition of a salary for their practice becomes an entity dependent on its position and its role in such a device, imperceptibly through the line from disinterested and critical practice of politics to the dogmatic defense of the job and personal interests. The solution to this dilemma is that the practice policy should be a gift, a gift, selfless and voluntary action that is priceless and is exercised without financial reward.
9 .- More topics can be found circumnavigate Marxism and they have to do with the meaning of political action, the vision of history, of human will, the concept of man the concept of reality with contradictions and internal dynamics, its pseudo logic and laws ... issues that would be interesting to lead the debate, trying to emerge from political discourse these ideological aspects that reveal power as determinants of articulating principles and practices.
One such issue is the notion of change, which is deployed in multiple ways, des of the idea of \u200b\u200brevolution to the macro social democratic reformism, through outreach to Eastern philosophies and experiences of real socialism. The constant opposition between determination and freedom, the weight of the structure and capacity of its the other, which is not negative thinking, the basis of a being in the world.
The constitution of reality as a set of practices that are embodied in individuals and institutions. The most abstract of Marxist thought, conscience recursive observer notes, the cause is returned as self-transformation, the theory itself is not interpretation the world but part of the world, action in the world is interpreted, etc.
10 .- Maybe we can make a Marxisms stratification by stage of individual development proposals by Dr. Freud, relating to bodily functions, giving us a chance with new link pornología. Marxism would b an oral (infant, which could also be called in the terminology Leninist Communism: An Infantile Disorder, or Oedipal stage of Marxism, there is no clear distinction between the will and determination, a Marxist ethics, which reads the world from a must be ideological) would also be a Marxist anal (or eschatological), with a clear tendency to extroversion, to make something of himself outside (the feces or the world), a Marxism that the realms of being and are dissociated and relate both through knowledge and practice, a scientific Marxism, that experiments with society as a laboratory where variables are correlated and laws governing history and behavior (a kind of social behaviorism was called dialectical materialism, which in any case is far more interesting than any sociology), and finally would have a genital Marxism in these areas before disociadas se reconcilian, asumiendo una nueva unidad, pero con contradicciones internas (me refiero a la teoría crítica) lo que en cierto modo inmoviliza, aunque no elimina las determinaciones, que ahora se reconocen como conceptuales aunque materiales, inaugurando una etapa masturbatoria o autoerótica del marxismo.
L. Maxwell
0 comments:
Post a Comment