Do Only Men Kidney Stones

editorial policy on LDC December

<>

Given the ongoing debate on future issues that the laboratory should be or not to sponsor and / or sponsor propose the following procedure:

- formation of an editorial committee to evaluate the proposed projects for sponsorship and / or sponsorship.

- the works in question are informed by a reader committee member of the LDC, the reading and evaluation should focus on the relationship between the works and discussions on the declassification and / or open programs in it: Defeat the cultural area, Animal Porn / Pornología, oral Marxism.

- in case the works in question or also intend to open a new declassification program, you will need to open that debate not only the editorial board but to the General Assembly.

This simple procedure but democracy and allowing foster internal discussion and monitoring of areas where LDC's proposal passes, will in turn prevent any publication see awarded to the LDC, the LDC is involved in qualifying and dangerous operations without any potential declassified.

understand that an argument for giving freedom to the publication of any work with LDC logo is to position our organization to the maximum amount of space possible. That is perhaps because the lab is a spectral entity has not been so dazzling in this public space. That is a selling point, ultimately.

Defender this argument would mean in political terms, proposed another scheme of intervention, which would evaluate the costs and benefits of advertising for the LDCs and that each work would be funded out submitted at the same editorial committee based on criteria such as: impact on the publishing market, pay for benefits for the organization and its members, etc.

I need editorial policy must ensure two key aspects of our organization:

- internal discussion, which involves using the editorial space to promote discussion

- fostering declassification in other areas: for this, the publications should give clear signals of what are the political guidelines of the LDC epistemological

This is the proposal. I welcome your feedback.

And to move forward in the discussion of these guidelines, I would remind you that this opened the discussion on oral Marxism in this blog, and are expected by year-end contributions.

President (watch the end of his soliloquy)